Values without networks

Last time I recollect and compare what was before perestroika, during and after it.

My conclusion is that people can act as if they are in network. That means "who connects whom", "social network analysis", "value networks", "shifting power in networks", "flash mobs", "show me your connections and I'll get to know who you are", etc. are only a part of truth or are not truth at all.

Sometimes people act as if they are organized, but they are not organized by someone. They looks organized due to the shared values. Values can spread themselves through networks - Mass Media or education, for instance, but over time Mass Media and educational networks can be changed or can disappear. People, who had accepted the values may form the illusion of the network - the memory of the past network. Why not consider banking as such the value?

Oddly, but the past may work today. If so, practically it's important to consider any situation with care - it can be a network or a former network, i.e. shared values.

Again and again I am getting back to money issue, not because it's my favorite issue. It's a knotty interdisciplinary issue, which relates to everyone.

Therefore suppose if global debt based banking will abandon Wall Street and find a new home, let's say, in Moscow, how to consider it? A dream or disaster? The same essence is changing its appearance?

All the risks must be taken into account, including that debt pyramid may ruin Russia and not only it over time.

And this is a song from perestroika age, worth to hear and think (poetry by Ilya Kormiltsev, performance by Nautilus Pompilius rock band):