Search This Blog

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

The past, present and future of money

This film is worth to watch. If you have a different view on the topic - please comment or give a link to the relevant content.

The Money Masters Part 1 of 2:

The Money Masters Part 2 of 2:

I think the problem is that states and private bankers compete in the same space - money as debt.

Can economy be flat, i.e. collaborative where money serves commodity trading and money is commodity backed? That's the question.


The global social business and consulting network with Web X.0 framework for collaborative self-consulting and on-line banking.

This is a proposal for partnership and negotiations.

A problem to solve:

When people do business they consult one another, form projects, but many SMEs can not use consulting services because of their high price and vague results (see point 4). Banking is separated from networking.

A solution:

The global social business and consulting network with Web X.0 framework for collaborative self-consulting and embedded payment solution.

The solution can be distributed in 3 divisions under name:

1. The social business network in which users do not waste time for preparing profiles and making introductions. After registering they can throw the business message in the space for networking and see the visualized results (for the analytical purposes of the users).

It must be designed (see the approaches) for mutual benefits, i.e. for understanding of the value of the business message.

2. The Web X.0 application for joint usage of the data in the tables for project/risk/competitiveness management.

3. The on-line bank, which income supports the divisions. Do read the opinions about the global currency preferences for the nearest future.

The conceptual testing of "Knowledge Person" is the current state of the project, which is:

1. The # 1 Google website based on the transition from Drucker's "Knowledge Worker" concept to my "Knowledge Person" concept.

2. The global think tank with the discussion group of well connected people and this blog.

3. Attractive for business people worldwide and they associate themselves with the "Knowledge Person" brand.

The group "For Knowledge Persons" is growing and you can join it.

The project can be considered as a prototype of a network state.

Now the project is open for the partnership and the relevant negotiations.

Sunday, November 18, 2007


I think Tchaikovsky, Piano Concerto No. 1 is a correct example where the composer's knowledge has a domain where musician's and spectators' knowledge domains meet one another:

It can look like

composer's knowledge (musicians' knowledge; spectators' knowledge),

where every knowledge or understanding of actions includes the connection of information and tangible reality.

All the participants act, even Tchaikovsky.

Who said that composers', musicians', spectators' knowledge and actions are intangible or tangible?

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Knowledge domain

Knowledge can not be separated from information which represents tangible reality and from tangible reality itself. It is not only a result of information processing, it covers two connected parts – tangible and intangible.

The reason to think so is that knowledge or understanding of actions makes the representations of the tangible reality visible, verifyed (sometimes) in order to make the correct decision.

If we contact knowledge in this way:

knowledge – information – tangible reality*

* (-) means connection

or in this:

information – knowledge - tangible reality

we can choose an illusive way where intangibles have their own value like credit money has or that knowledge society can be separated from production society.

A formula

knowledge (information - tangible reality)

could recover and multiply the value of one stream which is artificially separated in tangible and intangible, developing and developed, production and consumption ...

The global competition is not only about who will manage such the separation and the relevant resistance better. It is also about who can use a support of nature which may look like separated parts, but always has supreme power to keep wholeness.